Alex Jones Attorneys Want Off The Connecticut Sandy Hook Case

Right after the amazing implosion of his individual bankruptcy gambit, Alex Jones located himself again in condition court docket very last week making ready to finally facial area juries in the defamation fits by the Sandy Hook people, who have been subjected to many years of harassment after the podcaster known as them “crisis actors” collaborating in a “hoax” to gin up support for gun control.

On the eve of the Texas plaintiffs’ demo, Jones positioned a few primarily worthless LLCs in individual bankruptcy, correctly postponing his day of reckoning for the reason that the LLCs were being named as defendants in the tort fits. But he did not regulate to postpone it for long, considering that the Connecticut and Texas plaintiffs immediately non-suited the LLCs and acquired the cases remanded to point out courtroom. This landed him again in the chambers of Connecticut Excellent Court docket Decide Barbara Bellis, who by now imposed a default judgment and contempt sanctions for Jones’s refusal to comply with discovery.

Suffice it to say that the defendant extended ago exhausted her Honor’s endurance, so Jones’s attorneys were being dealing with an uphill battle when they tried to withdraw their look and get a additional hold off of the demo, which is established to start out on September 1.

On May perhaps 9 and then once more on Might 31, Jones’s notorious lawyer Norm Pattis moved to withdraw his organization from the scenario claiming that “Pursuant to Connecticut Rule of Professional Perform 1.16(a)(3), the undersigned and his colleagues’ withdrawal is obligatory.” They also indicated that they’ve filed very similar motions in Texas.

“We are in an untenable posture — our conversation with our consumer has damaged down,” Pattis’s affiliate Cameron Atkinson told the judge last 7 days. “We have not had direct communication with our client in about a thirty day period.”

The News-Instances has been following all the developments in the Jones scenario and was on hand to witness this windmill tilt by Atkinson, the unlucky law firm who appeared in courtroom back again in March to argue that his shopper was much too ill to appear for deposition, only to have opposing counsel open up his laptop to reveal that Jones was at that really moment in-studio broadcasting his Infowars show.

“The most ideal pathway is to have a hearing on the motion to withdraw (our illustration) very first and move forward with a new (trial) routine from there,” he argued. “I respect your honor’s recurring assertion that the demo date is going to maintain firm, but I imagine with these developments in the circumstance, it is not basically feasible at this point.”

“I am not shocked, attorney Atkinson, that is your position,” Decide Bellis responded. “I am going to deny it, and if you want to file a official composed motion … I will look at it.”

Choose Bellis then posted a minute purchase documenting both of those the procedural flaws in the attorneys’ withdrawal motions and the 13 other situations Jones swapped out his counsel, or tried using to do so, because this circumstance was submitted in 2018.

The court established a listening to on the problem for June 15, and ordered Pattis et al to remain on the scenario.

On March 9, 2022, the court docket entered an get stating that “(a)ll showing up counsel shall continue being as appearing counsel in these consolidated matters, unless of course a motion to withdraw visual appeal has been granted by the court docket. As an case in point, in lieu of appearances will not remove showing up counsel from the scenario. Also, the clerk will not act on an software to withdraw physical appearance.” These days, in light-weight of these disturbing circumstances, the court docket enters the pursuing supplemental purchase. Legal professional Atkinson, Lawyer Pattis, and the regulation business of Pattis & Smith are ordered to continue representing the remaining Jones defendants until eventually the courtroom has adjudicated this movement.

Which does not seem like she’s likely to postpone this demo, a lot a lot less let Pattis nope out without one more attorney to enter an visual appeal for Jones.

Well, great luck, fellas!

Alex Jones’ lawyer Norm Pattis asks to be dropped from Sandy Hook defamation case as trial looms [News-Times]
Lafferty v. Jones [Docket]

---

Liz Dye lives in Baltimore exactly where she writes about law and politics.